| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC Information Server 2020 (All versions < V2020 SP2 Update 5), SIMATIC Information Server 2022 (All versions < V2022 SP1 Update 2), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1 (All versions < V9.1 SP2 UC06), SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 (All versions < V2020 SP2 Update 5), SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 (All versions < V2022 SP1 Update 2), SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional V18 (All versions < V18 Update 5), SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional V19 (All versions < V19 Update 3), SIMATIC WinCC V7.4 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 (All versions < V7.5 SP2 Update 18), SIMATIC WinCC V8.0 (All versions < V8.0 Update 5). The affected products run their DB server with elevated privileges which could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands with administrative privileges. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Automation License Manager V5 (All versions), Automation License Manager V6.0 (All versions < V6.0 SP12 Upd3), Automation License Manager V6.2 (All versions < V6.2 Upd3). Affected applications do not properly validate certain fields in incoming network packets on port 4410/tcp. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause an integer overflow and crash of the application. This denial of service condition could prevent legitimate users from using subsequent products that rely on the affected application for license verification. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Virtualization as a Service (SIVaaS) (All versions). The affected application exposes a network share without any authentication. This could allow an attacker to access or alter sensitive data without proper authorization. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V10.0). Affected devices do not properly limit the bandwidth for incoming network packets over their local USB port. This could allow an attacker with physical access to send specially crafted packets with high bandwidth to the affected devices thus forcing them to exhaust their memory and stop responding to any network traffic via the local USB port. Affected devices reset themselves automatically after a successful attack. The protection function is not affected of this vulnerability. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), SICORE Base system (All versions < V26.10.0). The affected application contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XML inputs. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to exploit this issue by sending a malicious XML request, which may cause the service to crash, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.10), RTUM85 RTU Base (All versions < V26.10). The affected application contains denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability. The remote operation mode is susceptible to a resource exhaustion condition when subjected to a high volume of requests. Sending multiple requests can exhaust resources, preventing parameterization and requiring a reset or reboot to restore functionality. |
| An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.8.9. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations reassemble fragments even though some of them were sent in plaintext. This vulnerability can be abused to inject packets and/or exfiltrate selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP data-confidentiality protocol is used. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. Follow-up of CVE-2022-36323. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize data introduced by an user when rendering the web interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code and lead to a DOM-based XSS. |
| Affected devices do not properly handle the renegotiation of SSL/TLS parameters. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass the TCP brute force prevention and lead to a denial of service condition for the duration of the attack. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize an input field. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges to inject code or spawn a system root shell. |
| Affected devices do not properly authorize the change password function of the web interface.
This could allow low privileged users to escalate their privileges. |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept second (or subsequent) broadcast fragments even when sent in plaintext and process them as full unfragmented frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung Galaxy S3 i9305 4.4.4 devices. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext A-MSDU frames as long as the first 8 bytes correspond to a valid RFC1042 (i.e., LLC/SNAP) header for EAPOL. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 1030.36.604 for AWUS036ACH. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept fragmented plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The Wi-Fi implementation does not verify the Message Integrity Check (authenticity) of fragmented TKIP frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject and possibly decrypt packets in WPA or WPA2 networks that support the TKIP data-confidentiality protocol. |
| The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that the A-MSDU flag in the plaintext QoS header field is authenticated. Against devices that support receiving non-SSP A-MSDU frames (which is mandatory as part of 802.11n), an adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary network packets. |
| Affected devices contain a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated attacker to trigger a denial of service condition. The vulnerability can be triggered if a large amount of DCP reset packets are sent to the device. |
| Affected devices do not properly sanitize contents of trace files.
This could allow an attacker to inject code through social engineering an authorized user, who has the function right "Read diagnostics", to import a specially crafted trace file.
The malicious trace file is insufficiently sanitized and malicious code could be executed in the clients browser session and trigger PLC operations via the webserver that the legitimate user is authorized to perform. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Heliox Flex 180 kW EV Charging Station (All versions < F4.11.1), Heliox Mobile DC 40 kW EV Charging Station (All versions < L4.10.1). Affected devices contain improper access control that could allow an attacker to reach unauthorized services via the charging cable. |
