| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Fortinet FortiManager 5.0 before 5.0.11 and 5.2 before 5.2.2 allow local users to gain privileges via crafted CLI commands. |
| An open redirect vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal 4.0.0 and below allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the url parameter. |
| An OS Command Injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWLC 6.1-2 through 6.1-5, 7.0-7 through 7.0-10, 8.0 through 8.2, and 8.3.0 through 8.3.2 file management AP script download webUI page allows an authenticated admin user to execute arbitrary system console commands via crafted HTTP requests. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 5.0.x before 5.0.11, 5.2.x before 5.2.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified parameters. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 5.0.x before 5.0.11, 5.2.x before 5.2.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving unspecified parameters and a privilege escalation attack. |
| A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the 'Name' and 'Description' inputs in the 'Add Revision Backup' functionality. |
| Fortinet FortiManager 5.0.x before 5.0.11, 5.2.x before 5.2.2 allows remote attackers to obtain arbitrary files via vectors involving another unspecified vulnerability. |
| A password management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to carry out information disclosure via the FortiAnalyzer Management View. |
| An improper Access Control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to interact with unauthorized VDOMs or enumerate other ADOMs via another user's stolen session and CSRF tokens or the adomName parameter in the /fpc/sec/customer/policy/getAdomVersion request. |
| An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in FortiVoiceEntreprise version 7.0.0 and before 6.4.7 allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files from the system via sending crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests |
| FortiGuard FortiWeb before 5.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. |
| FortiMail 5.0.3 through 5.2.3 allows remote administrators to obtain credentials via the "diag debug application httpd" command. |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in FortiGuard FortiWeb before 5.0.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| FortiOS 5.0.x before 5.0.12 and 5.2.x before 5.2.4 supports anonymous, export, RC4, and possibly other weak ciphers when using TLS to connect to FortiGuard servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS content by modifying packets. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in collectoragent.exe in Fortinet Single Sign On (FSSO) before build 164 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large PROCESS_HELLO message to the Message Dispatcher on TCP port 8000. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiGuard FortiWeb before 5.0.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the sslvpn login page in Fortinet FortiOS 5.2.x before 5.2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says "The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack. |
| The Endpoint Control protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android and 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. |
| The FortiManager protocol service in Fortinet FortiOS before 4.3.16 and 5.x before 5.0.8 on FortiGate devices does not prevent use of anonymous ciphersuites, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information or interfere with communications by modifying the client-server data stream. |
