Search Results (3202 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-49193 1 Zendesk 1 Zendesk 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Zendesk before 2024-07-02 allows remote attackers to read ticket history via e-mail spoofing, because Cc fields are extracted from incoming e-mail messages and used to grant additional authorization for ticket viewing, the mechanism for detecting spoofed e-mail messages is insufficient, and the support e-mail addresses associated with individual tickets are predictable.
CVE-2024-49214 1 Haproxy 1 Haproxy 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
QUIC in HAProxy 3.1.x before 3.1-dev7, 3.0.x before 3.0.5, and 2.9.x before 2.9.11 allows opening a 0-RTT session with a spoofed IP address. This can bypass the IP allow/block list functionality.
CVE-2024-37016 1 Mengshen 1 M70 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
Mengshen Wireless Door Alarm M70 2024-05-24 allows Authentication Bypass via a Capture-Replay approach.
CVE-2024-39337 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
Click Studios Passwordstate Core before 9.8 build 9858 allows Authentication Bypass.
CVE-2024-53846 1 Erlang 1 Otp 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
OTP is a set of Erlang libraries, which consists of the Erlang runtime system, a number of ready-to-use components mainly written in Erlang, and a set of design principles for Erlang programs. A regression was introduced into the ssl application of OTP starting at OTP-25.3.2.8, OTP-26.2, and OTP-27.0, resulting in a server or client verifying the peer when incorrect extended key usage is presented (i.e., a server will verify a client if they have server auth ext key usage and vice versa).
CVE-2024-25906 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in WP Happy Coders Comments Like Dislike allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Comments Like Dislike: from n/a through 1.2.2.
CVE-2025-7448 1 Silabs 1 Wi-sun Stack 2026-04-15 N/A
Wi-SUN unexpected 4- Way Handshake packet receptions may lead to predictable keys and potentially leading to Man in the middle (MitM) attack
CVE-2024-2462 2026-04-15 N/A
Allow attackers to intercept or falsify data exchanges between the client and the server
CVE-2025-70043 1 Ayms 1 Node-to 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in TLS socket options
CVE-2024-54147 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
Altair is a GraphQL client for all platforms. Prior to version 8.0.5, Altair GraphQL Client's desktop app does not validate HTTPS certificates allowing a man-in-the-middle to intercept all requests. Any Altair users on untrusted networks (eg. public wifi, malicious DNS servers) may have all GraphQL request and response headers and bodies fully compromised including authorization tokens. The attack also allows obtaining full access to any signed-in Altair GraphQL Cloud account and replacing payment checkout pages with a malicious website. Version 8.0.5 fixes the issue.
CVE-2024-21543 2026-04-15 7.1 High
Versions of the package djoser before 2.3.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass when the authenticate() function fails. This is because the system falls back to querying the database directly, granting access to users with valid credentials, and eventually bypassing custom authentication checks such as two-factor authentication, LDAP validations, or requirements from configured AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS.
CVE-2025-66270 3 Apple, Google, Kde 6 Ios, Android, Gsconnect and 3 more 2026-04-15 4.7 Medium
The KDE Connect protocol 8 before 2025-11-28 does not correlate device IDs across two packets. This affects KDE Connect before 25.12 on desktop, KDE Connect before 0.5.4 on iOS, KDE Connect before 1.34.4 on Android, GSConnect before 68, and Valent before 1.0.0.alpha.49.
CVE-2024-21542 1 Spotify 1 Luigi 2026-04-15 8.6 High
Versions of the package luigi before 3.6.0 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write via Archive Extraction (Zip Slip) due to improper destination file path validation in the _extract_packages_archive function.
CVE-2025-6188 1 Arista 1 Eos 2026-04-15 7.5 High
On affected platforms running Arista EOS, maliciously formed UDP packets with source port 3503 may be accepted by EOS. UDP Port 3503 is associated with LspPing Echo Reply. This can result in unexpected behaviors, especially for UDP based services that do not perform some form of authentication.
CVE-2025-61778 1 Akkadotnet 1 Akka.net 2026-04-15 N/A
Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it's possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key'd Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces "fail fast" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one's application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers.
CVE-2011-20002 1 Siemens 3 Simatic, Simatic S7-1200, Simatic S7-1200 Cpu 2026-04-15 7.4 High
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V1 family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.0.2), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V2 family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.0.2). Affected controllers are vulnerable to capture-replay in the communication with the engineering software. This could allow an on-path attacker between the engineering software and the controller to execute any previously recorded commands at a later time (e.g. set the controller to STOP), regardless whether or not the controller had a password configured.
CVE-2025-61736 1 Johnsoncontrols 5 Istar Edge, Istar Ultra, Istar Ultra Lt and 2 more 2026-04-15 N/A
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in the product failing to re-establish communication once the certificate expires.
CVE-2025-9708 1 Kubernetes 1 Kubernetes 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
A vulnerability exists in the Kubernetes C# client where the certificate validation logic accepts properly constructed certificates from any Certificate Authority (CA) without properly verifying the trust chain. This flaw allows a malicious actor to present a forged certificate and potentially intercept or manipulate communication with the Kubernetes API server, leading to possible man-in-the-middle attacks and API impersonation.
CVE-2025-54470 1 Suse 1 Neuvector 2026-04-15 8.6 High
This vulnerability affects NeuVector deployments only when the Report anonymous cluster data option is enabled. When this option is enabled, NeuVector sends anonymous telemetry data to the telemetry server. In affected versions, NeuVector does not enforce TLS certificate verification when transmitting anonymous cluster data to the telemetry server. As a result, the communication channel is susceptible to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, where an attacker could intercept or modify the transmitted data. Additionally, NeuVector loads the response of the telemetry server is loaded into memory without size limitation, which makes it vulnerable to a Denial of Service(DoS) attack
CVE-2025-22223 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.3 may not correctly locate method security annotations on parameterized types or methods. This may cause an authorization bypass.  You are not affected if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity, or you do not have method security annotations on parameterized types or methods, or all method security annotations are attached to target methods