Export limit exceeded: 420979 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 420979 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 420979 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420979 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-113618 | 1 Kamsoft | 1 Zsirep Client Library | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| The ZSIRep client library (ZSIREP.CLIENT.DLL) is vulnerable to improper server certificate validation. It registers a process-wide .NET callback that accepts any certificate for HTTPS connections without verification. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to impersonate the ZSIRep server and intercept or modify authentication data and documents. The callback persists after the client is closed, weakening other HTTPS connections in the same application. The issue was fixed in version 2.12.3.1. The library is used in KS-SOMED (fixed in 2026.03.0.01), KS-PPS (fixed in 2026.03.1.0), KS-MEDIS (fixed in 2026.03.0.0), KS-SOLAB (fixed in 2026.3.1.0), and KS-ASW (fixed in 2026.3.0.1). | ||||
| CVE-2026-110932 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the theme resource endpoint of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. The issue occurs because the server fails to validate theme names before using them as keys for an on-disk gzip cache. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by sending many requests with unique, fabricated theme names, leading to persistent disk space exhaustion that survives server restarts and causes service disruptions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105770 | 1 Octo-sts | 1 App | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Octo STS (github.com/octo-sts/app) before 0.11.2 returns trust policy configuration to callers whose OIDC token does not satisfy that policy. TrustPolicy.CheckToken included the policy's issuer, subject and audience values or patterns and claim_pattern names and regular expressions in its PermissionDenied errors, which Exchange returned verbatim. Exchange also selected the GitHub App installation before checking the token, so errors from resolving the policy's app or app_pattern pin were returned to callers the policy does not trust. An attacker who holds any validly signed OIDC token, such as a GitHub Actions token from a repository they own, and who knows or guesses a target owner/repo and identity name can read that policy's matching rules, even when the policy is stored in a private repository. These rules often name internal repositories, branches, environments or cloud account identifiers. The issue does not allow minting tokens or bypassing a trust policy. This issue is fixed in 0.11.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103479 | 2026-11-06 | 7.6 High | ||
| The Pubjet | پابجت plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to the `checkToken()` AJAX handler — registered under `wp_ajax_pubjet-check-token` — performing no capability check and no nonce verification before unconditionally writing the attacker-supplied `token` GET parameter directly into the site-wide `pubjet_settings` option via `pubjet_update_setting()`, prior to any remote validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the plugin's stored REST API credential with an attacker-chosen value, immediately elevating their effective privileges to those of an authorized Pubjet API client and enabling them to invoke otherwise-restricted endpoints — `createReportage`, `updateReportage`, `deleteReportage`, `toggleCopyright`, and `createBacklink` — to create, modify, and delete arbitrary reportage posts and manipulate plugin state that Subscribers cannot normally access. The privilege escalation is self-reinforcing: because `RestApi::isTokenValid()` authenticates solely by comparing the incoming `Authorization` header against the value returned by `pubjet_token()`, which reads from the same option the unprotected handler writes to, the attacker-planted token is trusted as legitimate on all subsequent requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102943 | 1 Dagucloud | 1 Dagu | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dagu is a workflow engine with a built-in Web user interface. Prior to version 2.11.0, its MCP dagu_read operation with target dag_spec invokes the DAG specification API directly, bypassing the HTTP middleware introduced for CVE-2026-33344. The underlying resolver does not restrict resolved paths to configured DAG directories. An authenticated attacker with a viewer-role API key can supply an absolute or traversing path to read .yaml or .yml files outside those directories that are accessible to the Dagu process. The affected operation does not provide write or execution capability. This issue is fixed in version 2.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101605 | 1 Oracle | 1 Utilities Network Management System | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Utilities Network Management System product of Oracle Utilities Applications (component: System Wide). Supported versions that are affected are 2.4.0.1.0-2.4.0.1.33, 2.5.0.1.0-2.5.0.1.18, 2.5.0.2.0-2.5.0.2.11, 2.6.0.1.0-2.6.0.1.12, 2.6.0.2.0-2.6.0.2.10 and 25.12.0.0.0-25.12.0.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Utilities Network Management System. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Utilities Network Management System accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101601 | 1 Oracle | 1 Goldengate | 2026-11-06 | 5.5 Medium |
| Vulnerability in Oracle GoldenGate (component: Vendor Access Module). Supported versions that are affected are 21.3-21.23. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle GoldenGate executes to compromise Oracle GoldenGate. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle GoldenGate accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101600 | 1 Oracle | 1 Timesten In-memory Database | 2026-11-06 | 3.6 Low |
| Vulnerability in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: TimesTen IMDB). Supported versions that are affected are 26.1-26.1.1.3.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101598 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 7.2.20. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101592 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management For Process | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101591 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management For Process | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101589 | 1 Oracle | 1 Utilities Network Management System | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Utilities Network Management System product of Oracle Utilities Applications (component: System Wide). Supported versions that are affected are 2.6.0.1.0-2.6.0.1.12, 2.6.0.2.0-2.6.0.2.10 and 25.12.0.0.0-25.12.0.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Utilities Network Management System. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Utilities Network Management System accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101586 | 1 Oracle | 1 Helidon | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: helidon-webclient). Supported versions that are affected are 4.0.0-4.5.5 and 27.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Helidon accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-44277 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-06 | 9.1 Critical |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.2, FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.8, FortiAuthenticator 6.5.0 through 6.5.6, FortiAuthenticator 6.4.0 through 6.4.10 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114536 | 1 Drupal | 1 Uswds Paragraph Components | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal USWDS Paragraph Components allows Stored XSS. This issue affects USWDS Paragraph Components versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114534 | 1 Drupal | 1 Block Attributes | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Block Attributes allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Block Attributes versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119036 | 1 Perl | 1 Business::gocardless | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Business::GoCardless versions before 1.01 for Perl allow memory exhaustion by flattening legacy webhook payloads before checking their signature. A webhook body with a top-level "payload" key is verified as a legacy webhook. To rebuild the signed string, the payload is flattened into one key and value pair per leaf, each key carrying the full path to that leaf, and the pairs are then encoded, sorted and joined. A long key holding a long array costs memory proportional to the key length times the array length. A remote attacker can exhaust memory in the process receiving webhooks with a single request that carries no valid signature. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119037 | 1 Perl | 1 Business::gocardless | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Business::GoCardless versions before 1.01 for Perl accept forged webhooks when a configured webhook secret is undef or empty. signature_valid uses each configured secret as the HMAC key, and nothing rejects undef or an empty string, both of which Digest::SHA treats as an empty key. A secret read from an unset environment variable, or an empty entry in a list of rotated secrets, is used as is. A remote attacker can sign a forged webhook with an empty key and have it accepted as sent by GoCardless. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116474 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The `GITEA_TOKEN` of a Gitea Actions job authenticates as the `gitea-actions` system user, and the `/api/v1/user` email and GPG key endpoints accepted that user, so a job could register an email address and a GPG key on it; without required email confirmation (the default) the address is stored as activated. Commit verification treats a key without a real owner as the instance signing key, so any user who can run a workflow job could make commits signed with their own key show as trusted and signed by the instance in every repository where they appear, including pull requests to repositories the user cannot write to. The impact is limited to the displayed signature status: enforcement such as required signed commits only checks that a signature is verified and is unaffected, and no access is gained. The `/api/v1/user` routes now reject system users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117635 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The `/api/v1/admin` route group did not enforce the `public-only` restriction of personal access tokens. A public-only token with admin scope issued by a site administrator could therefore list private organizations and the email addresses of all users, create organizations, obtain runner registration tokens and create new site administrator accounts, the last of which persists after the token is revoked. Tokens of users who are not site administrators cannot reach these routes; public-only tokens are now rejected on the admin API. | ||||