| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Incorrect default permissions in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation in Satellite Management Controller (SMC) may allow an attacker with privileges to use certain special characters in manipulated Redfish® API commands, causing service processes like OpenBMC to crash and reset, potentially resulting in denial of service. |
| Improper syscall input validation in ASP (AMD Secure Processor) may force the kernel into reading syscall parameter values from its own memory space allowing an attacker to infer the contents of the kernel memory leading to potential information disclosure. |
| Improper key usage control in AMD Secure Processor
(ASP) may allow an attacker with local access who has gained arbitrary code
execution privilege in ASP to
extract ASP cryptographic keys, potentially resulting in loss of
confidentiality and integrity. |
| Improper system call parameter validation in the Trusted OS may allow a malicious driver to perform mapping or unmapping operations on a large number of pages, potentially resulting in kernel memory corruption. |
| Improper input validation in AMD Power Management Firmware (PMFW) could allow a privileged attacker from Guest VM to send arbitrary input data potentially causing a GPU Reset condition. |
| Improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer in PCIe® Link could allow an attacker with access to a guest virtual machine to potentially perform a denial of service attack against the host resulting in loss of availability. |
| Missing authorization in AMD RomArmor could allow an attacker to bypass ROMArmor protections during system resume from a standby state, potentially resulting in a loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Improper Initialization within the AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware can allow an admin privileged attacker to corrupt RMP covered memory, potentially resulting in loss of guest memory integrity |
| In AMD Zynq UltraScale+ devices, the lack of address validation when executing CSU runtime services through the PMU Firmware can allow access to isolated or protected memory spaces resulting in the loss of integrity and confidentiality. |
| Improper input validation in the SMM communications buffer could allow a privileged attacker to perform an out of bounds read or write to SMRAM potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or integrity. |
| Improper input validation in AMD Graphics Driver could allow a local attacker to write out of bounds, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or denial of service. |
| Improper cleanup in AMD CPU microcode patch loading could allow an attacker with local administrator privilege to load malicious CPU microcode, potentially resulting in loss of integrity of x86 instruction execution. |
| Improper input validation within RAS TA Driver can allow a local attacker to access out-of-bounds memory, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| Type confusion in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the External Global Memory Interconnect Trusted Agent (XGMI TA) leading to a memory safety violation potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Improper input validation in the AMD Graphics Driver could allow an attacker to supply a specially crafted pointer, potentially leading to arbitrary writes or denial of service. |
| Improper input validation in the SMM handler could allow an attacker with Ring0 access to write to SMRAM and modify execution flow for S3 (sleep) wake up, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| The security state of the calling processor into Trusted Firmware (TF-A) is not used and could potentially allow non-secure processors access to secure memories, access to crypto operations, and the ability to turn on and off subsystems within the SOC. |
| Improper input validation within the XOCL driver may allow a local attacker to generate an integer overflow condition, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or availability. |
| Improper input validation in the GPU driver could allow an attacker to exploit a heap overflow potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
