Export limit exceeded: 419349 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (419351 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76506 | 2026-11-04 | 7.6 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco UCS Central Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to achieve remote code execution or conduct information disclosure attacks on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in an HTTP request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected endpoint on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands, write arbitrary files to the filesystem, and obtain sensitive information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76419 | 1 Cisco | 1 Cisco Unified Communications Manager | 2026-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22060 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| All versions of StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) in default & common configurations allow an unauthenticated attacker to access a limited set of APIs that are intended for use within the grid. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22058 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-11-04 | N/A |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.3 and higher allow an attacker with product-specific knowledge and the ability to communicate with the Grid Network on certain ports to make unauthorized requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20241 | 1 Cisco | 2 Identity Services Engine Passive Identity Connector, Identity Services Engine Software | 2026-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the authorization mechanism of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to obtain an endpoint identity certificate. This vulnerability is due to improper authorization checks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass authorization to obtain an endpoint certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122054 | 1 The Gnu C Library | 1 Glibc | 2026-11-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| Converting crafted BIG-HKSCS input to UCS-4 or the internal wide character encoding, for example with iconv, in the GNU C Library version 2.18 through 2.31 may result in the converter making no progress, causing the calling application to hang. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122032 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| SPIP before 4.4.29 contains a SQL injection vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with back-office access to inject arbitrary SQL by submitting a differing where parameter value in the POST body versus the GET query string on the /ecrire/?exec=articles endpoint, bypassing spip_sanitize_from_request() sanitization. Attackers can exploit this request parameter mismatch to extract database contents, including protected articles and bcrypt password hashes of users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122007 | 1 Oqtane | 1 Oqtane Framework | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Oqtane Framework before 10.3.0 contains a broken access control vulnerability in SettingController.cs that allows an authenticated site administrator to read and modify settings belonging to other sites within the same tenant database by supplying an arbitrary entityId for Site or Role type settings, since IsAuthorized and FilterPrivate fail to verify the requested site matches the current alias SiteId. Attackers can exploit the /api/setting endpoints to disclose private values such as SMTPPassword, SMTPClientSecret, and ExternalLogin ClientSecret, and to alter another site's OIDC/OAuth2 authentication configuration without requiring host privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122006 | 1 Rubyonrails | 1 Active Storage | 2026-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| The activestorage gem before 8.1.4.1 for Ruby on Rails, when ImageMagick attachment processing occurs, can allow server read and write operations (e.g., reading secret_key_base) because the ImageMagick analyzer runs when a file is attached, and there is not an ImageMagick security policy to block unintended functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121993 | 2026-11-04 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| wePOS (Point Of Sale for WooCommerce) before 2.0.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the wepos/v1/payment/process REST route that allows authenticated vendor-level users to mark arbitrary orders as paid and completed by supplying another order's ID. Attackers with only the publish_shop_orders capability (such as Dokan vendor staff) can invoke the payment processing endpoint with an order ID they do not own to trigger the order completion lifecycle, including stock reduction and granting of paid-order access, without making any real payment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121970 | 1 Wphostingdev | 1 Pay With Vipps And Mobilepay For Woocommerce | 2026-11-04 | 3.7 Low |
| Pay with Vipps and MobilePay for WooCommerce (woo-vipps) before 6.4.1 contains an improper cryptographic signature verification vulnerability in the recurring-payment webhook handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook requests when no local webhook secret is stored, because the code fails to return on an empty secret and computes an HMAC keyed with an empty string using a loose == comparison instead of hash_equals. Attackers can craft a recurring.agreement-stopped.v1 event with a known agreementId and a matching empty-key signature to cancel a victim's active WooCommerce subscription. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121967 | 1 Coder | 1 Coder | 2026-11-04 | 4.9 Medium |
| Coder 2.28.0 before 2.29.22, 2.30.0 before 2.34.13, 2.35.0 before 2.35.10, 2.36.0 before 2.36.8, 2.37.0 before 2.37.5, and 2.38.0 before 2.38.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the AI Gateway passthrough router, which forwards percent-encoded dot segments upstream without rejecting them. Authenticated users can send paths such as %2e%2e or ..%2F under allowlisted prefixes to reach unintended provider endpoints using the deployment's centrally managed provider key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121966 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2026-11-04 | 8.7 High |
| Traefik 2.x before 2.11.60 and 3.x before 3.7.16 sends ForwardAuth subrequests (and, in 3.7, Ingress NGINX auth-url requests) through an auth-server connection pool shared by all clients, exposing connection-bound NTLM or Negotiate authentication. An unauthenticated attacker can reuse another user's authenticated connection, receiving the victim's identity via authResponseHeaders to access backends as that user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121965 | 1 Parseplatform | 1 Parse-server | 2026-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Parse Server before 8.6.113 and 9.0.0 before 9.10.6-alpha.5 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability when building objects for Cloud Code triggers and LiveQuery, where a dot notation key whose intermediate segment resolves through an inherited member writes onto a process-wide built-in. Clients with write access to an object in a class with a trigger or LiveQuery can corrupt a built-in function, making unrelated requests fail until restart and denying service to all clients and hosted applications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121964 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the RD Gateway RPC client, where rpc_client_recv_fragment writes BIND_ACK and ALTER_CONTEXT_RESP fragments into a persistent PDU stream after checking only total capacity rather than remaining capacity from the current stream position. A malicious or compromised RD Gateway can send crafted RPC fragments with manipulated alloc_hint and frag_length values to overwrite client heap memory with attacker-controlled data, causing a crash or potentially arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121963 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the asynchronous dynamic rdpsnd channel that allows malicious RDP servers to trigger freed callback access by closing the channel with queued audio PDUs. Attackers can send a training PDU then close the channel so the playback thread reads the freed callback in rdpsnd_virtual_channel_write, crashing the client. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121961 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the freerdp-proxy DRDYNVC tracker when intercepting the drdynvc channel. A malicious target server can repeatedly send CREATE_REQUEST_PDU for an active channel id, racing front DATA handling to free a borrowed context and crash the proxy process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121960 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the NLA-enabled shadow server when a CredSSP TSRequest omits negoTokens. Unauthenticated attackers can send a crafted seven-byte TSRequest containing only the version field to trigger a fatal WINPR_ASSERT and abort the server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121959 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains an infinite loop vulnerability in websocket_context_read that fails to handle a zero BIO result with payload outstanding. A malicious RD Gateway can send a truncated WebSocket frame followed by a TLS close_notify, causing a client thread to spin and consume CPU until killed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121958 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High |
| FreeRDP through 3.32.1 has a heap out-of-bounds write in the RDPGFX client because the delete_surface callback truncates surface hash keys to 16 bits, leaving the surface table inconsistent so HashTable_GetKeys writes past its allocated key array. A malicious or man-in-the-middle RDP server can exploit this by creating surfaceId 0xFFFF, closing the RDPGFX channel, sending repeated DELETESURFACE PDUs, and then sending ENDFRAME or RESETGRAPHICS. | ||||