Export limit exceeded: 423813 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 423813 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (423813 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12080 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 5 Qemu, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Nvidia and 2 more | 2026-11-09 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in the QEMU Guest Agent (qga). A local unprivileged user can exploit a vulnerability in the guest-ssh-add-authorized-keys command handler by manipulating symbolic links. This can occur either through a deterministic directory-symlink bypass or a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) file-symlink race. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to gain ownership of arbitrary root-owned files or directories, leading to root access. This vulnerability requires an external management layer (e.g., libvirt) to trigger the affected code path. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4603 | 3 Netapp, Openssl, Redhat | 40 500f, 500f Firmware, 8300 and 37 more | 2026-11-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit the modulus size when performing the checks. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable. Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications when using the `-check` option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121558 | 1 Ricky-7-yan | 1 Intelligent-audit-system | 2026-11-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| AuditPilot before commit 4669c93 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in _metadata_allowed in rag/agentic_rag.py that allows authenticated users to read other projects' knowledge by supplying project_id. Attackers with read:knowledge scoped to one project can set context.project_id via GET /api/knowledge/query or POST /api/research/answer to retrieve same-tenant project knowledge chunks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111453 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| Apache Airflow's API endpoint for deleting an asset's queued events checked Dag edit permission against the `dag_id` query parameter, but deleted the queued events of every Dag the caller could read. An authenticated user with edit permission on one Dag and read access to others could suppress asset-triggered runs of Dags they cannot edit. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-75157: users who upgraded to apache-airflow 3.3.2 for that fix are still affected and should upgrade to apache-airflow 3.4.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114594 | 2026-11-09 | N/A | ||
| A time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the Sandisk Dashboard installer allows a local, authenticated standard user to replace an installer-staged binary in a user-writable temporary directory between validation and execution. The elevated installer then executes the attacker-controlled binary, resulting in local privilege escalation to a high-integrity (administrative) context. This issue affects Sandisk Dashboard through 5.2.2.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111503 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-09 | 7.1 High |
| Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91917 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-09 | 8 High |
| Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111498 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-09 | 4.7 Medium |
| OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Resource Locking vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111499 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-09 | 5.5 Medium |
| Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111500 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-09 | 5.4 Medium |
| Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55272 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 6.2 Medium |
| In loadDescription of DeviceAdminAdd.java, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55275 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 7.4 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a race condition. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55283 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55287 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 8.4 High |
| In onCreate of GrantCredentialsPermissionActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into granting account credentials due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119274 | 1 Infoblox | 1 Nios | 2026-11-09 | 4.8 Medium |
| Infoblox NIOS version upto 9.1.0 contain a vulnerability related to improper input validation that allows a stored XSS | ||||
| CVE-2026-55288 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 8.4 High |
| In validEfCfis of SIMRecords.java, there is a possible way to cause a denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55289 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple functions in multiple locations, there is a possible execution of sensitive USSD codes due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55292 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| In rw_ci_data_cback of rw_ci.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to integer underflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9143 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 1 more | 50 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 47 more | 2026-11-09 | 8.8 High |
| Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads or writes. Impact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or even a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols involving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we're aware of, either only "named curves" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they specify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can't represent problematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable application is low. In particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates, so problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509 certificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an "exotic" curve encoding. The affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(), and various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions. Applications working with "exotic" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters, that make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero constant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a result of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution cannot easily be ruled out. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49935 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-09 | 4 Medium |
| In getXmlFileNameForUser of LocaleManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confusable path traversal. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||