Export limit exceeded: 11078 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11078 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-27901 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| SAP Asset Accounting could allow a high privileged attacker to exploit insufficient validation of path information provided by the users and pass it through to the file API's. Thus, causing a considerable impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47845 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Lim Kai Yang Grab & Save.This issue affects Grab & Save: from n/a through 1.0.4. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25151 | 1 Ecessa | 1 Wanworx Wvr-30 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Ecessa WANWorx WVR-30 versions before 10.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to create a new superuser account by tricking an authenticated administrator into loading the page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27974 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in FUJIFILM printers which implement CentreWare Internet Services or Internet Services allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to alter user information. In the case the user is an administrator, the settings such as the administrator's ID, password, etc. may be altered. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendor listed under [References]. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28141 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29009 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in easy-popup-show all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the administrator and to perform unintended operations if the administrator views a malicious page while logged in. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3798 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malicious requests to multiple hosts on the local network. If such a request reaches the server, it will cause one of the following (depending on the chosen payload): shell command execution, reflected XSS or cross-site request forgery. This issue affects Phoniebox in all releases through 2.7. Newer 2.x releases were not tested, but they might also be vulnerable. Phoniebox in version 3.0 and higher are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29019 | 1 Esphome | 1 Esphome | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| ESPHome is a system to control microcontrollers remotely through Home Automation systems. API endpoints in dashboard component of ESPHome version 2023.12.9 (command line installation) are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) allowing remote attackers to carry out attacks against a logged user of the dashboard to perform operations on configuration files (create, edit, delete). It is possible for a malicious actor to create a specifically crafted web page that triggers a cross site request against ESPHome, this allows bypassing the authentication for API calls on the platform. This vulnerability allows bypassing authentication on API calls accessing configuration file operations on the behalf of a logged user. In order to trigger the vulnerability, the victim must visit a weaponized page. In addition to this, it is possible to chain this vulnerability with GHSA-9p43-hj5j-96h5/ CVE-2024-27287 to obtain a complete takeover of the user account. Version 2024.3.0 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2017-20221 | 1 Telesquare | 2 Sdt-cs3b1, Sdt-cs3b1 Firmware | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Telesquare SKT LTE Router SDT-CS3B1 version 1.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting missing request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that perform administrative actions when visited by logged-in users, enabling command execution with router privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4712 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2026-04-14 | 7.5 High |
| Information disclosure in the Widget: Cocoa component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34749 | 1 Payloadcms | 1 Payload | 2026-04-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. Prior to version 3.79.1, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made. This issue has been patched in version 3.79.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34228 | 1 Emlog | 1 Emlog | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.8, the backend upgrade interface accepts remote SQL and ZIP URLs via GET parameters. The server first downloads and executes the SQL file, then downloads the ZIP file and extracts it directly into the web root directory. This process does not validate a CSRF token. Therefore, an attacker only needs to trick an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious link to achieve arbitrary SQL execution and arbitrary file write. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5918 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2020-26141 | 4 Alfa, Cisco, Redhat and 1 more | 191 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, Ip Conference Phone 8832 and 188 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The Wi-Fi implementation does not verify the Message Integrity Check (authenticity) of fragmented TKIP frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject and possibly decrypt packets in WPA or WPA2 networks that support the TKIP data-confidentiality protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4401 | 2 Wordpress, Wpchill | 2 Wordpress, Download Monitor | 2026-04-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Download Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the `actions_handler()` and `bulk_actions_handler()` methods in `class-dlm-downloads-path.php` in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.10. This is due to missing nonce verification on these functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete, disable, or enable approved download paths via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39848 | 1 10ij | 1 Dockyard | 2026-04-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dockyard is a Docker container management app. Prior to 1.1.0, Docker container start and stop operations are performed through GET requests without CSRF protection. A remote attacker can cause a logged-in administrator's browser to request /apps/action.php?action=stop&name=<container> or /apps/action.php?action=start&name=<container>, which starts or stops the target container. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-29521 | 2 Hereta, Shenzhen Hereta Technology | 3 Eth-imc408m, Eth-imc408m Firmware, Hereta Eth-imc408m | 2026-04-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit forged requests using automatically-included HTTP Basic Authentication credentials to add RADIUS accounts, alter network settings, or trigger diagnostics. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25682 | 1 Victoralagwu | 1 Cmssite | 2026-04-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| CMSsite 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting crafted pages that submit POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like source=add_user, source=edit_user, or del=1 to create, modify, or delete admin accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4141 | 2 Edckwt, Wordpress | 2 Quran Translations, Wordpress | 2026-04-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Quran Translations plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the quran_playlist_options() function that handles the plugin's settings page. The function processes POST requests to update plugin options via update_option() without any wp_nonce_field() in the form or wp_verify_nonce()/check_admin_referer() verification before processing. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings (toggling display options for PDF, RSS, podcast, media player links, playlist title, and playlist code) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33373 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration Suite | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Web Client due to the issuance of authentication tokens without CSRF protection during certain account state transitions. Specifically, tokens generated after operations such as enabling two-factor authentication or changing a password may lack CSRF enforcement. While such a token is active, authenticated SOAP requests that trigger token generation or state changes can be performed without CSRF validation. An attacker could exploit this by inducing a victim to submit crafted requests, potentially allowing sensitive account actions such as disabling two-factor authentication. The issue is mitigated by ensuring CSRF protection is consistently enforced for all issued authentication tokens. | ||||