Export limit exceeded: 421008 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 421008 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (421008 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-101600 | 1 Oracle | 1 Timesten In-memory Database | 2026-11-06 | 3.6 Low |
| Vulnerability in Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database (component: TimesTen IMDB). Supported versions that are affected are 26.1-26.1.1.3.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database executes to compromise Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle TimesTen In-Memory Database accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101598 | 1 Oracle | 1 Vm Virtualbox | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 7.2.20. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101592 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management For Process | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101591 | 1 Oracle | 1 Agile Product Lifecycle Management For Process | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101589 | 1 Oracle | 1 Utilities Network Management System | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Utilities Network Management System product of Oracle Utilities Applications (component: System Wide). Supported versions that are affected are 2.6.0.1.0-2.6.0.1.12, 2.6.0.2.0-2.6.0.2.10 and 25.12.0.0.0-25.12.0.0.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Utilities Network Management System. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Utilities Network Management System accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101586 | 1 Oracle | 1 Helidon | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Helidon product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: helidon-webclient). Supported versions that are affected are 4.0.0-4.5.5 and 27.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Helidon. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Helidon accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-44277 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-06 | 9.1 Critical |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.2, FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.8, FortiAuthenticator 6.5.0 through 6.5.6, FortiAuthenticator 6.4.0 through 6.4.10 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114536 | 1 Drupal | 1 Uswds Paragraph Components | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal USWDS Paragraph Components allows Stored XSS. This issue affects USWDS Paragraph Components versions: from 0.0.0 to 3.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114534 | 1 Drupal | 1 Block Attributes | 2026-11-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Block Attributes allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Block Attributes versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119036 | 1 Perl | 1 Business::gocardless | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Business::GoCardless versions before 1.01 for Perl allow memory exhaustion by flattening legacy webhook payloads before checking their signature. A webhook body with a top-level "payload" key is verified as a legacy webhook. To rebuild the signed string, the payload is flattened into one key and value pair per leaf, each key carrying the full path to that leaf, and the pairs are then encoded, sorted and joined. A long key holding a long array costs memory proportional to the key length times the array length. A remote attacker can exhaust memory in the process receiving webhooks with a single request that carries no valid signature. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119037 | 1 Perl | 1 Business::gocardless | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Business::GoCardless versions before 1.01 for Perl accept forged webhooks when a configured webhook secret is undef or empty. signature_valid uses each configured secret as the HMAC key, and nothing rejects undef or an empty string, both of which Digest::SHA treats as an empty key. A secret read from an unset environment variable, or an empty entry in a list of rotated secrets, is used as is. A remote attacker can sign a forged webhook with an empty key and have it accepted as sent by GoCardless. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116474 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The `GITEA_TOKEN` of a Gitea Actions job authenticates as the `gitea-actions` system user, and the `/api/v1/user` email and GPG key endpoints accepted that user, so a job could register an email address and a GPG key on it; without required email confirmation (the default) the address is stored as activated. Commit verification treats a key without a real owner as the instance signing key, so any user who can run a workflow job could make commits signed with their own key show as trusted and signed by the instance in every repository where they appear, including pull requests to repositories the user cannot write to. The impact is limited to the displayed signature status: enforcement such as required signed commits only checks that a signature is verified and is unaffected, and no access is gained. The `/api/v1/user` routes now reject system users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117635 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The `/api/v1/admin` route group did not enforce the `public-only` restriction of personal access tokens. A public-only token with admin scope issued by a site administrator could therefore list private organizations and the email addresses of all users, create organizations, obtain runner registration tokens and create new site administrator accounts, the last of which persists after the token is revoked. Tokens of users who are not site administrators cannot reach these routes; public-only tokens are now rejected on the admin API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-117649 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 3.5 Low |
| The issue timeline API and the web issue page hid cross-reference events that point at issues the reader cannot access, but not "dependency added" and "dependency removed" events. When a readable issue had been linked as a dependency to an issue in a repository the reader cannot access, for example a private repository, any reader of the first issue, including anonymous users of a public repository, received the linked issue's current title, body, state, labels, poster and attachment names through the API, and its repository, number and title on the web page. Creating the link requires access to both issues; comments and attachment downloads of the linked issue stayed protected. Dependency events are now filtered with the same read permission check; a related exposure of unlinked attachment metadata through hidden dependency placeholders was already fixed in 28.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119533 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Repository and organization project boards listed the pull requests that reference each issue on the board without checking whether the viewer can read them. When a private pull request mentions an issue on a board the viewer can open, the board revealed the private repository's path and the pull request's number, title and state, to anonymous visitors in the case of a public board. The pull request body, diff and files were not exposed. Boards now skip linked pull requests in repositories where the viewer cannot read pull requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90963 | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Essential Real Estate WordPress plugin before 5.3.5 does not perform any authorization or publication-status check in one of its AJAX actions, allowing unauthenticated users to read the full contents of property listings that have not been published, together with the private name, email address, phone number and office address of the listing agent. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123490 | 1 Craftcms | 2 Cms, Craft Cms | 2026-11-06 | 8.8 High |
| Craft CMS from 5.8.17 before 5.11.2 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability because getOwners() applies caller criteria without cleansing the query configuration. Authenticated control panel users can invoke attacker-selected static PHP callables via crafted criteria to promote every account to administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92899 | 1 Apache | 1 Wss4j | 2026-11-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| Apache WSS4J remembers the Nonce of each UsernameToken it accepts, so a captured token cannot be reused. It stored the Nonce as raw base64 text, but authentication decodes that text and uses the bytes.The same bytes can be written as base64 in several ways. An attacker who captured an authenticated request could re-send it with a space added to the Nonce: the password digest still verified, but the token no longer matched the remembered one, so the replay was accepted. Since a UsernameToken does not cover the message body, the captured token could then be reused on requests of the attacker's choosing until it expired. Affects deployments with a nonce replay cache configured, as Apache CXF has by default, and only tokens using a password digest. The cache is now keyed on the decoded Nonce. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.2 or 3.0.6 or 2.4.4, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64798 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| Unused reservation with no CVE record; removed from tickets/pool during the 2026-11-06 stale-CVE remediation | ||||
| CVE-2025-46896 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| Unused reservation with no CVE record; removed from tickets/pool during the 2026-11-06 stale-CVE remediation | ||||